Digital scams, disputed signatures, manipulated conversations, voices that are not yours: forensic work exists to demonstrate the truth technically, for individuals as well.
A contract, loan or receipt turns up bearing your signature, but you never signed it. Forensic handwriting examination demonstrates the forgery on technical grounds.
Someone opened an account, a loan or a company using your documents. Questioned document examination and digital forensics reconstruct how the fraud happened.
Pix transfers, cloned WhatsApp accounts, fake profiles: the digital evidence of the scam can be preserved and examined to support your claim.
Edited screenshots, messages out of context or manipulated: the examination verifies the integrity and the authenticity of the material.
A recording attributed to you, including one created by artificial intelligence: forensic phonetics compares the voices with scientific method.
Does the case already have an unfavourable examination? An independent technical opinion can identify flaws and ground your defence.
Each case calls for a different route, and one wrong step in the first hours (a badly worded statement, a hasty contact) can compromise your rights later on. Tell what happened and get the right guidance for YOUR situation, from the very first contact.
Work for individuals centres on forensic handwriting and questioned document examination, forensic phonetics and digital fraud. Each case is assessed individually, with transparency about viability and costs from the first conversation.
How much it costs, how long it takes, whether the report is valid in any court: the answers are on the frequently asked questions page.

You can retain the forensic expert directly, and that happens every day. But forensics and law are roles that complete each other: the report demonstrates the fact; it is the lawyer who knows how to turn it into a claim, a settlement or a defence. Two routes work well:
This is the ideal scenario: the examination is aligned with the legal strategy from the first conversation, counsel advises what to do with each finding, and the report reaches the case at the right moment and in the right form.
This is legitimate and common too: retaining the examination directly to check whether something is in fact happening and to understand it technically. With the report in hand, it becomes far easier to identify the right lawyer for that subject, and he starts work with the evidence already built.
On either route, one constant recommendation: even when you retain the expert directly, seek a lawyer's guidance as soon as the picture is confirmed. The expert report is the raw material; the one who knows what to build with it, in your specific case, is the one who masters the law.

The sooner you act, the lower the risk of the criminal widening the fraud: a stolen phone turns into a changed e-mail password, an accessed bank account and cascading loss. Containment first, evidence next: and delete nothing, what is on the device and in the chats will still matter. Victims of scams and digital crime take priority: first reply within 1 hour, during business hours.
Some of these cases are reported in anonymised form, with confidentiality fully preserved. You may recognise yourself in one of them.